The legal risks facing Turkish companies operating in Kuwait fall broadly into four categories: corporate structure and local partnership arrangements, choice of law and arbitration in commercial contracts, debt recovery and the cross-border recognition of judgments, and tax and reporting obligations on the Turkish side. Although Turkey and Kuwait signed a reciprocal investment promotion and protection agreement in Kuwait in 2010, along with a separate double taxation treaty, this framework does not automatically fill the gaps that arise in day-to-day commercial dealings.
Why the Legal Framework for Entering the Kuwaiti Market Needs Separate Consideration
Consider an Istanbul-based furniture manufacturer planning to set up a working relationship with a distributor in Kuwait. Such companies typically settle the product and logistics side first, leaving the legal structure to be addressed at the last minute, right before the contract is signed. Yet in Gulf jurisdictions like Kuwait, commercial law operates within its own distinct framework, one where company law, investment regulation, and international trade practice are closely intertwined.
Assuming that concepts from Turkish company law will produce the same outcome in Kuwait is itself a significant risk. Because concrete requirements such as the permitted local ownership share, the licensing process, or operating permits can change over time, current rules should be confirmed with a qualified legal advisor in Kuwait or with the relevant official authority. In our view, the real risk lies not in the contract clauses themselves, but in overlooking this initial decision about which legal structure the relationship will be built on.
Risk Areas in Corporate Structure and Local Partnership Relations
A Turkish construction or contracting company looking to operate in Kuwait generally faces a few options: a company established with a local partner, an agency/representation arrangement, or, in certain sectors, a permitted direct structure. Which option is appropriate depends on the scope and sector of the activity, and specific ownership ratios and conditions should never be written into a contract without first confirming them with an official source.
Suppose a machinery exporter enters into a relationship granting exclusive sales rights to a local Kuwaiti agent, but fails to set out in writing the conditions and notice period required for termination. Once the relationship breaks down, the company finds itself facing unexpected difficulties both in finding a new agent and in terminating the existing one. Relationships of this kind underline the importance of ongoing legal counsel for companies.
The Importance of Governing Law and Arbitration Clauses in Commercial Contracts
In any contract signed with a buyer or distributor in Kuwait, it is critical to set out the governing law and dispute resolution method in writing. If the parties fail to include a clear clause on this, determining which court or arbitration institution has jurisdiction can itself become a major point of contention once a dispute arises.
There is an advantage here that is often overlooked. Kuwait became a party to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in 1978, while Turkey acceded to the Convention under Law No. 3731 in 1991, applying it from 1992 onward. Both countries apply the Convention on a reciprocal basis. This means that a properly drafted arbitration clause significantly facilitates the recognition of an arbitral award rendered in one country within the other.
Even so, some practitioners drop the arbitration clause altogether, reasoning that insisting on it will simply create unnecessary resistance if the Kuwaiti party does not readily agree. From a sound legal standpoint, however, the opposite approach is correct. Settling the seat of arbitration and the arbitral institution from the outset makes the forum in which any future dispute will be heard predictable, and that predictability offers more protection than any other clause in the contract. Omitting this clause at the contract drafting stage is one of the hardest gaps to remedy later. The general framework for commercial contracts reinforces this point.
Debt Recovery and Recognition of Judgments in Turkey
A Turkish company may become a creditor as a result of an arbitral award or court judgment obtained in Kuwait. The key question is how that judgment can be enforced against the Kuwaiti debtor’s assets in Turkey. This is governed by Articles 50 to 59 of Turkish Law No. 5718 on International Private Law and Procedural Law.
These provisions draw a distinction between recognition and enforcement. Recognition gives the foreign judgment conclusive evidentiary effect in Turkey, while enforcement (tenfiz) makes the judgment actually executable in Turkey. Enforcement additionally requires that the reciprocity condition be met. For example, a Turkish company holding an arbitral award from a distribution dispute in Kuwait that wishes to enforce it against the debtor’s bank account or real estate in Turkey must first file an enforcement action under simplified procedure before the competent civil court of first instance. Proceeding directly to execution without first obtaining this enforcement order is not possible. The general process involved is covered in more detail under recovery of corporate receivables.
Tax and Reporting Obligations on the Turkish Side
Operating in Kuwait also creates obligations not only there, but for the parent company in Turkey. Repatriating profit earned abroad to Turkey requires separate consideration of transfer pricing rules and double taxation regulations.
For example, an engineering firm providing services through a Kuwaiti branch must document the invoicing of services billed to the Turkish parent company in line with the arm’s length principle. If this documentation is incomplete, additional questions can arise during a tax audit in Turkey. Monitoring the current provisions of the double taxation treaty between the two countries together with a financial advisor is the most practical way to reduce this risk.
A Practical Roadmap: The Right Order of Steps
For a Turkish company planning to begin operations in Kuwait, the recommended sequence is as follows. First, confirm from current official sources which forms of structuring the intended line of business is permitted to use under local regulation. Next, determine the company or representation structure accordingly. Then set out the governing law and arbitration clause in the contracts in writing. Finally, review the tax and reporting obligations on the Turkish side.
Completing these steps in order, before operations begin, prevents the majority of disputes that would otherwise arise later. The following points in particular should not be overlooked in this process.
- Confirming the current status of the business sector under local investment regulations
- Choosing a company or representation structure suited to the scale and sector of the activity
- Setting out in writing the governing law and seat of arbitration clause in contracts
- Taking the reciprocity requirement into account for the future enforcement of any arbitral award in Turkey
- Monitoring transfer pricing and double taxation obligations on the Turkish side
Legal Disclaimer
